In fact I would argue it's far superior because you don't have to switch to the clumsy built-in browser.
The "direct search of catalogues" I think is a bit misleading - since Zotero sits in Firefox, this "direct" search is built in. Maybe, would find a place for this document or whatever may become out of it. Everybody may redistribute the document "as is" or with any changes, with or without acknowledging the source. I'll leave the document on my server for a while, but can't guarantee I'll stay there forever, and may decide to pull it without notice. I would be grateful for any corrections and suggestions concerning this document. Some claims are copied from those comparison tables without having been checked by me. Though I'm certainly proud on my job ) I realize that I'm not an expert in Zotero and even less so in EndNote, so probably the document is improvable. Therefore I decided to do it better ) Here are the results (as PDF and also as an editable RTF file). most of them state that Zotero supports about a dozen of output styles, whereas more than 1000 of them are available now. I have tried to find a "ready to use" side-by-side comparison table, but didn't really like any of what I could find: either too little, or too much and unordered, mostly obsolete, and sometimes plainly wrong.
Zotero is recommended by 8 of them, EndNote by 9.Ģ. The following table shows bibliographic management tools recommended by (libraries of) the top 10 US universities: The resources I've used to gather information are listed in the following Zotero report:ġ. From my current point, I am only interested only in comparing Zotero with EndNote X1 (the version installed at our institution), not with other tools. Now I'm trying to persuade THOSE WHO DECIDE to allow Zotero as the second tool of choice, and gathering arguments. About a year ago it was decided to introduce EndNote as the standard tool here. I'm working at a Fraunhofer Institute (an applied research institute with close ties to universities, ).
0 kommentar(er)
